[QFJ-367] A validation configuration to bypass checking of enumeration for a tag Created: 04/Nov/08 Updated: 15/Nov/12 Resolved: 05/Apr/10 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | QuickFIX/J |
| Component/s: | Engine |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Alvin Wang | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 1 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Description |
|
If received msg contains a custom enum value for a tag, QFJ will reject it saying "Value is incorrect (out of range) for this tag". |
| Comments |
| Comment by Toli Kuznets [ 04/Nov/08 ] |
|
Wasn't this addressed by |
| Comment by Alvin Wang [ 04/Nov/08 ] |
|
what do you mean "syntax"? a validation switch in the configruation file? |
| Comment by Laurent Danesi [ 05/Nov/08 ] |
|
Hi Alvin, Do you want to have a field containing an enum with a fixed number of values or an open-ended enum (with unknown number of values)? Laurent |
| Comment by Alvin Wang [ 05/Nov/08 ] |
|
Laurent, I want have a field containing an enum with a fixed number of values, but meanwhile I want QFJ have a validation switch that can bypass the checking of the valid value of that field to avoid "Value is incorrect (out of range) for this tag" rejection. |
| Comment by Steve Bate [ 05/Apr/10 ] |
|
You can specify an "allowOtherValues" attribute in the data dictionary for the enumeration element. Perhaps we should consider supporting this is a session configuration? |
| Comment by Alvin Wang [ 15/Nov/12 ] |
|
yes, it would be very helpful to have a session configuration! |